Going all the Way: Expanding the Role of Marketing

Sales and MarketingIn the old days, Sales led and Marketing followed. Not any more. Increasingly, Marketing now leads and Sales follows. In response to this new balance of responsibilities, companies are rushing to create “sales and marketing alignment” where both groups are responsible for the sales outcomes. This is good, but only part of what’s needed. The stakes are high and companies that fail to fully adjust will suffer an enormous miss while alienating many potential customers and influencers.

Marketing is now expected to nurture and develop relationships before they become leads …and after they become sales. Buyers resist being sold to until much deeper into the buying process, so marketing remains involved much longer. Even after the sale, Marketing and Sales need to team closely to establish and nurture interest and relationships. This is the environment today.

Companies risk alienating potential customers if they sell too hard, too soon. Abundant information, from online product information to peer reviews, alters the traditional sales funnel in some important and fundamental ways. The traditional sales funnel with its sequential steps and metrics no longer describes the process for many sales. In adapting, companies can choose to go half way or all the way. This is where Marketing’s role really expands.
Read the rest of this entry »

Running on Empty

Nigel Tufnel turned the volume "up to 11"

Trevor, the CEO of a mid-sized professional services firm approached me about his marketing and business development. They had a well-oiled machine–they even called it that–but it wasn’t producing like it had in years past, and he was trying to figure out how to ramp up the volume.  I call this the Nigel Tufnel approach of simply dialing everything up. It wasn’t that Trevor’s offerings were lacking. In fact, the rest of his organization and the market were poised for growth.  His firm provided good value and demonstrated expertise in some emerging areas.

What happened was that his marketing strategy had gone stale.

A stale marketing strategy carries a high, but largely underappreciated, cost.  Big wins, high-performing customer relationships and achieving the next level are celebrated, but the contra events are often missed entirely. Lost business, under-performing customer and/or partner relationships, and the inability to get to the next level are but a few of the costs of a stale marketing strategy.  The staleness starts in marketing, but extends to business development, partners and sales until everyone is underperforming.

Read the rest of this entry »

Time to (Radically) Rethink the Role of the CMO

The CMO role is failing to produce business resultsLet’s be blunt. As a group, CMOs are failing. According to Spencer Stuart, CMOs on average survive only 23 months in the job.  That’s half as long as other C-suiters, and they aren’t moving on because they were promoted to CEO, a job that draws heavily from the ranks of CFOs and VPs of Sales. Today, it is rare to see a marketer in the top job.  With career prospects like these, who’d want to be a CMO?

Jonathan Salem Baskin, writing in Ad Age, recommends that CMOs focus on activities driving sales directly rather than just brand.  He’s right, if you are a newly hired CMO, go for the quick win. However, he comes up short in advising how to make the role of CMO more successful.

Read the rest of this entry »

Better Insights

It is a central part of my business, but I never stop being amazed by the array of surprising insights (to my clients) from doing deep-dive customer interviews. I create significant value talking to people that my clients deal with regularly. How can that be?

It’s not because my clients don’t care about their customers. So, why do I get better insights than they can get?

Read the rest of this entry »

Back to the Future

When organizations are small a few people can each do a lot.  This helps foster intimacy and highly nimble organizations. Because of this organizational intimacy, hierarchies and reporting can be a bit grey, so just stepping in and doing something that needs to get done doesn’t ruffle feathers.  Often it is encouraged.  This is a great environment for connecting with and staying close to customers.

Later, as organizations grow larger and need to manage a complex enterprise these is a shift to where there are many people, each focusing on specific areas.  Their job is their turf, so they protect it, often aggressively.  In this environment, stepping out of organizational lines is more likely to result in a knife in the back than a congratulatory slap.  Not only that, but even if people get along and have good intentions, the organization is much less nimble.  For all the talk about breakdowns in infrastructure, the greatest loss is in how customer relationships suffer and become less of an overall driver.

Countless executives and authors of management books have grappled with how to restore the lost organizational intimacy.  Management structure doesn’t offer an answer (although some are definitely worse than others) because with many managers and executives already spending eight or more hours a day in meetings, there simply isn’t bandwidth or structure to accept and integrate yet more information.

We’ve tried to harness technology.  Data warehouses drown us in even more data.  Video conferencing saves travel time and expense, but is just a better way to do (often inefficient) meetings. Email management can be a significant time suck.  Cell phones and mobile devices, by themselves, make us more available without providing better information.

If we can’t make hierarchies and silos work better, perhaps focusing on re-capturing the intimacy of small organizations can help.

Enter the Social Enterprise

For all the technology and hype, the social enterprise is best viewed as simply an attempt to scale key benefits of small organizations.  The type of organization where people have extensive knowledge about the surrounding context and are able to make faster and better decisions based on a wider variety of relevant information.  Microblogging, project wikis, instant messaging and a variety of mobile apps are all ways to create new, better and timelier information flows that also provide valuable context.  Why wait until next week’s project status if you can get real-time updates?  Why spend an hour or more a day sorting through email threads when you can access an always up-to-date central wiki?

Think about it.  It’s the spirit of Dave Packard’s and Bill Hewlett’s Management By Walking Around philosophy able to scale to organizations that are too big, complex or dispersed to physically walk around.  It’s even better because information can both be pulled (requested) and pushed (offered) in a variety of formats that support context and relevance.

Good business is built on customer relationships

Back to why we care.  While there are numerous benefits to creating a more intimate organization, the biggest and most important is way it impacts customers.  It’s more than just support reps having better information; it’s executives, sales reps and marketing all having access to the crucial context-setting knowledge and insights that enable better and more nimble decision making.

Smiles to Dollars

New research from Nancy Rothbard at Wharton links better employee morale to increased company performance. That sounds like the realm of HR and I’m a marketing guy, so the question for my clients is, “How can Marketing leverage this effect?” Below are four things Marketing can do to improve employee morale. Note that making killer t-shirts for the all-hands meeting is not on my list as I’ve focused on actions with real business impact.

Read the rest of this entry »

Lessons from Steve Jobs for People Who Aren’t Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs

The past week saw lots of advice about the secrets of Steve Jobs’ success.  Guy Kawasaki concisely distills what he learned from Steve Jobs into 12 lessons.  It’s a good article with lessons worth reflecting upon. But what if you’re not a once-in-a-generation visionary leading a team of crack engineers with billions of dollars at your fingertips?   What if you are smart, but perhaps not smarter than the combined industry-at-large?  What can Steve Jobs teach you?

My thoughts naturally wandered to what we can learn from Steve Jobs that can help my clients—smart, decisive business leaders that don’t have the outlandish resources of Steve Jobs.

Read the rest of this entry »

Five Benefits Your Customer Reference Program Should Deliver (but probably does not)

You wouldn’t hire a new employee without talking to references, and yet many companies fail to leverage their own references when new customers apply a similar level of due diligence to major purchases.

A customer reference program can do a little, or a lot.

At a minimum, a customer reference validates key information communicated during the sales process, reducing the risk in the customer’s mind regarding your company’s ability to execute.

A really good reference does much more, creating enthusiasm for your company and higher credibility than anything you can do yourself. At the end of the day, people—even buyers at large companies—are more inclined to buy from people they believe in. If they believe in your sales rep, that’s great. If they believe in your company, that’s an advantage that’s hard to beat.

While contemplating this post, a colleague told me it wasn’t worth writing because “every company has a reference program.” While that may be true on the surface, in my experience the lack of best practices results in meager returns for many. The two most important reasons customer reference programs under perform are: (1) companies don’t understand the full benefits, and (2) they don’t have the right person to manage the program.

You need to get serious

Many customer reference programs operate more like ad hoc programs drumming up references when demanded rather than as strategic and well-defined parts of the sales process.

The result is references that confirm you have actual customers, and perhaps that your product works, but these programs do not foster and encourage the kind of infectious enthusiasm that makes people believe in your company and make them want to do business with you.

If you are a big, well-known company selling a well-established offer, you might be ok. However, if your company, its offer or how you stack up against competitors is not perfectly known to your prospective customers, then strong customer references provide valuable sales leverage.

Surprisingly, your company can have a lot of problems and still have a fabulously successful reference program. I had an enterprise software customer who gave a glowing reference at the same time his system was actually down (and not for the first time). You can read more about why this wasn’t an exotic “corner case” in a forthcoming post.

What you should expect

Here are five benefits you can expect from a well-executed, programmatic customer reference program.

  1. Happier, more committed customers. Yes, asking your customers to do more can actually make them happier. Building the relationships that create great references will also create strong alignment between you and your key references.
  2. Higher sales close rate. Sure, strong customer references help close more deals. But not just any deals, references help close deals where you’ve already invested heavily, so the return is even higher.
  3. Get more out of your best reps. Strong references help all reps close more deals, but a good program will build trust with the sales reps that own the reference accounts. Typically, these are also your best sales people, and good sales reps control access to key people within their accounts to reduce headaches and the need to do damage control. A well-managed reference program builds the trust needed for these reps to relax access. If they aren’t spending their time being gatekeeper at reference accounts, they have more time to sell.
  4. Improve your offer. Many customers will suggest product and service improvements if they can find a willing ear. However, when your customers believe in your company and want to share in its success, they’ll go much further and eagerly tell you which marketing messages are working and how to defeat your competitors.
  5. Fewer distracting fire drills. When a major customer, especially an important reference, has problems, a resource-consuming fire drill ensues. In my experience, the reference program manager frequently knows about potential problems long before support or professional services. You still have to build the internal lines of trust, but the opportunity to proactively reduce the number and severity of support fire drills is there if you want it.

A good customer reference program is not easy or cheap, but its biggest dividends are concentrated where you need them most—closing deals where you have already invested in the full sales cycle). In addition, the unexpected benefits are meaningful and many.

There’s still no substitute for good marketing

Marketing automation applications such as Aprimo, Marketo, and Eloqua promise to revolutionize marketing the way that ERP and CRM systems did to other parts of the enterprise over the past 15 years. Unfortunately, for those that remember, the adoption process is likely to be similarly painful. ERP and CRM vendors certainly didn’t talk about it, but for a good many years failed implementations (ones that failed to pay for themselves) were common. According to some reports at the time, failures accounted for over half of all implementations.

The need for marketing automation systems is great. They provide an essential framework and tools for scaling marketing execution to address the burgeoning requirements of social media and individualized content. Marketing automation, however, is no magic bullet; it is a force multiplier, so garbage in, garbage out.

How do you ensure success? Most fundamentally, successful implementations of marketing automation require better marketing. These systems are huge consumers of content, so you have to feed the beast. The less homogeneous your market, the greater the breadth of required content you’ll have to generate.

Content is the key—good content that is—because that is how you connect with a variety of audiences. You can’t create content to address a range of individual needs without understanding each of your segments and audiences. You have to understand what they want to hear, but also how they want to hear it, so you’ll have to employ multiple media (web site, direct marketing, blogs, articles, video, social media, etc.). You also have to support several types of messaging, including: firm to buyer, firm to influencer, and peer-to-peer.

No one has automated creation of great content, so crafting content to address the variety of needs requires old-fashioned marketing: knowledge of customer needs, benefits of your product or service, segments, market trends, competitors, and channels. Excellence here is foundational for success with marketing automation.

Once you have content, technology is an enormous help since the vast majority of your content will be digital, and distributing electrons is cheap and easy. Further, most of your content can be quickly repurposed so your content creation provides lots of leverage. A conversation can become a blog post. Blog posts can become the basis for an email newsletter. A presentation can be posted to SlideShare. An article can become a speech.

So, while you need lots of content, it’s not quite as daunting as it may seem—if you are a good marketer. The daunting part is tracking individual targets and delivering the appropriate content via the preferred media. That’s what marketing automation does really well. Marketing automation in the hands of good marketers is a formidable force that is re-shaping how the best companies go to market.

To Many People, Pricing Is a Black Art

Too many companies are haphazard when it comes to pricing, thinking good pricing methodology is a black art.  Does this really matter?  It does.  A lot. Research by McKinsey determined that for Global 1200 companies a one percent improvement in selling price on average resulted in an 8.7 percent increase in operating profits.

Unfortunately, you can’t simply raise your prices by 1 or 2 or 5 or 10 percent. Or can you? Sometimes you can! Only once in my career have I had a customer tell me, “I don’t care what it costs,” but I’ve had a number of clients where after talking to customers it became clear they had a lot of unused pricing power. In other cases, clients were employing massive discounting (in one case an average of 85% off list price). It doesn’t take an expert in black arts to know that’s broken.

So, what do you do?

Ideally, you get a clean sheet and can do the research necessary to understand the true value of your offer and how customers perceive alternatives. As a consultant, however, I get called into messy situations where the options are more limited. There is still a lot that can be done.

The most common areas where you can make an immediate difference are:

  • Price what your customers want to buy. This is a major source of discounting. The product team bundles several options together to create more “value,” and then sales discounts the package because the customer only wants one or two of the components.
  • Better segmentation. If everyone is uncomfortable with the pricing, with some thinking it is too high while others think it is too low, you could be using one offer to address both high- and low-end segments. “Splitting the difference” is a poor strategy that prices you out of the low end while leaving money on the table at the high end. There are lots of ways to create multiple offers, but sometimes it takes some creativity. An excellent case study of what can be done is here.
  • Understand alternatives. Adobe has lots of competitors, but within the creative professional segment, there are few alternatives. This gives Adobe unusual pricing power. Within some segments, such as vocational education, there are neither competitors nor realistic alternatives as skipping an upgrade puts the school at a competitive disadvantage in attracting students and employers.

There is a lot more you can do to optimize pricing, but for many companies these principles can deliver significant—even substantial—returns that drop straight to the bottom line. In most cases, solutions can be implemented quickly. Not only that, they’ll help you position yourself better with customers so you can grow both volume and ASP.